Old guard businesses have plenty to offer sustainable economy start-ups

[By Aaron Hay, reposted from the original at the Forum for the Future blog, and his tumblr.]

“All the old companies need to fit into the new economy.” That’s what I heard from Zipcar founder Robin Chase, upon returning from Christmas break, to discover that rental car giant Avis had acquired the car-sharing upstart. Only as I began to process what this might mean for my favourite way to move a sofa-bed around London, Mike Barry at Marks & Spencer tweeted that ‘old economy businesses’ are buying into the new economy, citing Avis as the latest taker.

After hearing these two, my fears of a Zipcar-as-walking-dead scenario subsided. I started to wonder what the Zipcar’s views are on the qualities an ‘old guard’ business can bring to a partnership with seemingly incompatible new economy ventures.

Avis – and for that matter, all traditional rental car operations – bears hallmarks of the old guard. For one, they serve middle-class, twentieth-century customers well enough. By allowing holidaymakers to get to their final destinations from any airport, by equipping executives with the means to make sales calls, or by providing replacement vehicles for insurance claimants, Avis allows customers to do more of the same – drive. The rental car industry has grown and thrived as a result.

But to succeed, Avis requires another old guard qualification – lots of physical capital. Specifically, tonnes of iron, steel and aluminium, shaped into the form of automobiles, and parking lots, rental desks, and fuel to store it, lease it, and move it around. Behind all this are hefty financing programmes to balance the piles of cash required to buy fleets. For Avis, industrial-strength finance and the economy of scale afforded by over 400,000 vehicles are hand-in-glove.

By contrast, Zipcar is a brave little harbinger of the new economy. Since its beginnings, the company built a new model based on flexibility, scalability and innovation. Fundamentally, Zipcar utilises resources as efficiently as possible. It doesn’t own branches or lots; by locating its cars in car parks, it takes advantage of existing real estate. Sophisticated technology means less staff. For its customers, by easily and inexpensively renting cars by the hour, Zipcar often eliminates the need for personally-owned cars at all. Indeed, this new economy car business actually helps solve problems of personal transportation in gridlocked urban locales.

But Zipcar’s biggest battle has been for capital. An obstacle in rental or sharing start-ups is the need for up-front, sizeable investments in the assets to be shared. I discovered this in my master’s course, while building the financial model for a pram business based on collaborative consumption – and in the financial statements of Zipcar itself.

Capital expenditures must be covered in a reasonable timeframe, with some profit built in to make the venture worth it. Zipcar is acquiring pricey assets, and taking a guess at what cities, neighbourhoods or car parks its assets should ‘live in’ to be available to its most profitable customers. Although the company is now rather good at this, it didn’t have the pockets to finance rapid expansion without posting initial losses, as its public accounts will attest.

Enter old guard Avis, financial machinations in hand. With access to a pool of capital, one which Avis is likely willing to invest, the new economy Zipcar is freed from the vagaries of expanding a rental business. It’s no secret that the rental car majors have access to the lowest new vehicle prices of any industrial buyer – something that is likely to undercut the pricing Zipcar can get by several thousand pounds, thus improving the crucial capital payback period for car-sharing in ‘AvisZip’. Moreover, Zipcar now solves one of its biggest fleet problems – it can deploy underutilised Avis autos to fully deliver on pent-up weekend demand it cannot serve with its fleet alone. (Yes, Enterprise Rent-A-Car still offers $9.99 weekend specials in the United States; traditional rental operators have been trying to drum up weekend demand in their fleets for decades.)

Combining Zipcar’s urban market expertise, marketing cachet, and brand goodwill with Avis’s financial acumen, fleet management expertise and worldwide footprint may yield a very exciting old guard – new economy collaboration, indeed.

Despite Zipcar’s enhanced powers to reduce personal car-use, there’s been a chorus of naysayers across whose concerns range from the ‘blandness’ of adding Avis cars to the fleet mix, to price increases and worries about customer service. If Avis would like to realise a return on its $500m USD investment, I doubt it’ll allow these concerns to materialise. One need only look at Unilever’s acquisition of Ben & Jerry’s, or Molson Coors’ buyout of Creemore Springs, to understand that Avis will probably emulate the management philosophy of ‘separate culture, integrated benefit’.

So, what can old guard businesses learn from the Avis – Zipcar transaction? A few thoughts spring to mind:

  • With (coveted) access to the old guard’s secure, affordable capital, proven sustainable businesses can scale rapidly. Avis recognised that Zipcar had not only reached a turning point in its profitability – it probably saw that this newfangled business model was beginning to eat into its share in major urban markets. By co-opting this new economy operation, Avis will directly benefit by scaling on its initial successes. Both Avis and Zipcar desire rapid growth; if this move is well-managed, that’s exactly what we’ll see from the company’s combined car sharing operations.
  • As environmental change raises the cost of living, the new economy will profit the most. In the case of Zipcar, rapid depreciation and rising fuel, parking and insurance charges contribute to the cost of vehicle ownership, and thus directly to the attractiveness of its value proposition. Old guard businesses should understand which products or services in their portfolios are most vulnerable to environmental change (via increased costs or prices). More sustainable offerings from new economy startups become more attractive as the price of substitutes rise. This could be a starting point for exploring where the old guard should make new investments.
  • The old guards that allow new economy cultures to thrive within will win. I’ll admit that the Avis – Zipcar deal could fail miserably if Avis fails to accommodate Zipcar’s internal and customer culture. The last thing the company needs is a revolt in its freshly acquired, urbane, web-savvy ‘Zipster’ customer base, or the exit of key Zipcar intellectual capital. Realising fleet goals and resource sharing targets while allowing the culture of the acquired to thrive will be a new, needed skill at Avis, and any other old guard for that matter.

I, for one, welcome the opportunity to shoehorn a Freecycle’d armoire into my Avis-sourced, Zipcar-booked hatchback. On a weekend, this time.

“The best way to find out if you can trust somebody is to trust them” -Ernest Hemingway

“The best way to find out if you can trust somebody is to trust them”  -Ernest Hemingway 

“Trust in me, just in me, shut your eyes and trust in me” – Python Kaa’s song from the Jungle Book

Since our last “Sharing is caring” blog, the momentum for all things collaborative has gathered pace. The “Sharing Economy” encompasses anything from skill swopping, home exchange, time banking and recycling  to the peer-to-peer rental, a fascinating new disruptive economic model. As examples, WhipCar enables individuals to rent out their vehicles to local neighbours  whilst goCarShare , which has been particularly successful targeting music festivals, enables car seats to be hired out where passengers contribute to petrol and the running costs of the car .

Space – sharing organisations such as Sharemystorage and Thestorenextdoor enable people with spare space at home to provide storage facilities for their local neighbours whilst earning a return on otherwise unoccupied space.  What’s exciting about the peer-to peer rental model is it provides an opportunity to generate income from assets that are being dramatically underutilized and obviates the need to buy and own things that are used once in a blue moon – the story about the average electric drill being used for only 12 minutes may well be apocryphal ….but only slightly. The current economic environment, where real incomes are being squeezed relentlessly, is a perfect one in which these types of  sharing and renting initiatives should thrive.

Well, it’s not quite so simple. Back to Ernest Hemingway on trust – we can dismiss Python Kaa! Last week  at Telefonica’s global  developer  platform BlueVia’s   Collaborative Consumption Camp,  the issue of  trust ( sometimes verging on paranoia) emerged as one of the major barriers to a successful peer-to-peer business. For Drummond  Gilbert, founder of goCarShare, the  mythical psycopathic axe murderer  was on most people’s minds whilst at thestorenextdoor,  it was  the pyromaniac storing  a cache of fireworks.

Recent events have undermined the public’s trust in a number of institutions such as the banks, parliament, the food industry, the police, the press – the list is endless – and it appears that for peer-to-peer renting, where trust is fundamental, the same reservations apply. There are all number of reasons why we are more reluctant to trust each other – the fact that we are too busy working to get to know our neighbours; the all-pervasive health and safety culture which militates against community activities; the geographical  fragmentation of the family unit – we often move to get jobs -  and media scare-mongering to name a few.

So how can the issue of trust be addressed when it involves individuals sharing in some cases personal and intimate spaces?

Insurance is one way that individuals can feel more secure about their transactions but it is often extremely complicated and expensive to administer.  Rating systems– such as those used by Amazon, eBay and AirBnB  – can also enhance reputation and build “trust”. The problem is that for the plethora of collaborative, peer-to-peer businesses that are emerging, there is no aggregated rating system to refer to and it appears that those organisations which have collected valuable data regarding buyers and sellers e.g Ebay and Airbnb are not willing to freely share that data – not very collaborative!  An alternative is to use social networking sites such as Facebook as a “trust metaphor” to gather information and build communities around certain interests e.g travel routes, bands etc . This is perhaps a first step but it is clear that for most collaborative consumption networks to be able to scale successfully, a more comprehensive and independent rating system is essential.

Wednesday June 20th is National Sharing Day with a whole range of mass sharing activities taking place across the country organised by The People who Share.  There are so many ways to get involved – and  so, to borrow the Nike catchphrase – just do it!

Resources:

Compareandshare.com  is the marketplace for the Sharing Economyaiming eventually to  aggregate all sharing, making it easier for people to find shares and swaps.

Rachel Botsman’s TED talk on Collaborative Consumption

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 176 other followers